Follow See a post that violates the rules below? As you can see below, you can add more platforms and remove by clicking on Add and remove buttons. Select from the list below each social media platform you have used within the last 5 years. But there are at least 50 more normal and civilized countries I can visit without being treated like a criminal, so I'll just go there. So, list the current username and handle. While it is expected that the new move will affect 14.
Individuals hoping to enter the United States on visas will now have to give Uncle Sam a peek into their online life. An estimated 65,000 applicants per year had fallen into that category. An estimated 65,000 applicants per year had fallen into that category. The change, which was proposed in March 2018, is expected to affect nationals of St Kitts and Nevis and about 15 million foreigners who apply for visas to enter the United States each year. This site does not include all credit card companies or all available credit card offers. If not, they'll never find it, so it's not a social media to them.
The new visa application forms list a number of social media platforms and require the applicant to provide any account names they may have had on them over the previous five years. Other people have posted on my Facebook in that time, which I saw when I logged in, but not me. After selecting the social media platform, applicants must then provide their social media identifier name or handle. In addition to requiring the five years of social media history, the application will also ask for previous telephone numbers, email addresses, prior immigration violations and any family history of involvement in terrorist activities, according to the notice. Select from the list below each social media platform you have used within the last 5 years.
You need to share the username that is used by you in the social media platform. Please do not provide your passwords. Applicants now run the risk of misrepresentation if they do not disclose all of their information, as well as the risk of having their social media posts or activity misinterpreted by government officials. Just want to give feedback? The United States wants to add another layer of security for its visa application. People believe that providing personal information without an idea of how the screeners are going to analyze it, is an invasion of their privacy. Please state what is true.
Before now, only applicants who needed additional vetting — such as people who had been to parts of the world controlled by terrorist groups — would need to hand over this data. For example, in case of Facebook, if you go to settings section, you will find it, see below. I 100% understand where you're coming from, but as a European working in the tech industry I could see myself living in California for a few years working at and learning from one of the big tech giants. I was placing apps in folders on my phone and went back and forth in my mind on if I should put Reddit in social media or entertainment. These questions must be completed by all applicants hoping to work, study, or live permanently in the U. Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Ideally, the platforms would not have user data anymore. Previously, only applicants flagged for extra scrutiny, such as individuals who may have traveled to areas known to have high-levels of terrorist activity, were required to answer questions regarding their social media, email, and phone number history. The form provides a drop-down list of 20 social media platforms, including LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. How about multiple accounts in other Social Media platforms? This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. The only account they can even remotely verify is possibly Facebook and what do people post there? What was the response of American civil society? The new regulation impacts nearly all applicants with exceptions made only for certain diplomatic and official visa types, the news outlet reported.
I would be scared shitless living there. When it filed its initial notice to make the change, the department estimated it would affect 710,000 immigrant visa applicants and 14 million nonimmigrant visa applicants, including those who want to come to the U. Site The credit card offers that appear on the website are from credit card companies from which ThePointsGuy. An estimated 65,000 applicants per year had fallen into that category. The change, which was proposed in March 2018, is expected to affect about 15 million foreigners who apply for visas to enter the United States each year. However, those directives have been.
In addition to social media handles, you should also provide mobile numbers, Email Ids and international travel details for the past 5 years. Under a newly approved information collection procedure, some foreigners will be asked for extensive background information, including biographical data for the previous 15 years and going back as far as five years. Federal authorities argue the moves are necessary for national security. Any misrepresentation on these forms has historically caused issues during visa interviews. They also give applicants the option to volunteer information about social media accounts on platforms not listed on the form. As far as I know, approvals are at their discretion and they don't really need to justify why they rejected your visa.
Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. In addition to their social media histories, visa applicants are now asked for five years of previously used telephone numbers, email addresses, international travel and deportation status, as well as whether any family members have been involved in terrorist activities. Does the government hope to get access to that? He's already been subject to crazy amounts of scrutiny, by immigration, met his girlfriend's ex bf who was waving a gun around. The New York Times notes that this new policy could News outlets and civil rights groups nationwide have begun commenting on the implications of such a policy, which essentially assumes every person hoping to enter the U. It remains unclear whether the addition to visa applications have been implemented across the world.
I would not even care to travel there, and now this spying shit is a definite no-go. See below the exact text that is for guidance. I'm sure I won't be missed there, so they won't be crying over my boycott for sure. And one would assume that the hallowed First Amendment would encompass such accounts, even if they are made by non-Americans. But a false claim would lead to major consequences and even visa denial. You can even lie in your visa application and maybe they will not check. This will be a vital tool to screen out terrorists, public safety threats, and other dangerous individuals from gaining immigration benefits and setting foot on U.